The truth must be told: This bullet was not fired from just one rifle. It was fired from years of demonization. From the media that painted him as an enemy of democracy. From academia that turned him into a symbol of “fascism” because he dared to speak out for freedom of expression.
For decades, Sweden was something between a natural pine-paneled rec room and a how-to manual on “how to be a country without causing problems.” But in the last two or three years, something has changed there.
The lie of “Israeli apartheid” is not a mistake, but a strategy. It is designed not to fix Israel—but to destroy the idea of it.
And so we must not treat it with academic leniency or liberal humor. But we are allowed, and even desirable, to treat it with cynicism—and to expose its absurdity.
The Europe of late 2025 is a history lesson for us all: an entire continent that sold itself out in the name of empty values. The question is – will we learn from this lesson in time, or will we find ourselves in a decade writing about “Israel 2035 – Outlines for the Image of the Post-Jewish Middle East”?
When I hear “from the river to the sea,” I don’t think of scenery. I don’t think of a trip. I don’t think of peace. I hear, simply, “We want you to disappear.”
We know that won’t happen – not because we believe in fairies, but because we know how to swim in the river, and protect the sea.
Europe once had knights, cathedrals, opera, cheese competitions, and wars that were understandable—sort of.
Today it has more mosques than cathedrals, more Ramadan than Christmas, and more consideration for Islam than for the culture that produced Dante, Beethoven, and the Mona Lisa.
To those who shout “Free Palestine” on the streets of London, Paris or New York — understand: “Free” Palestine will cost you dearly.
It will not come without blood, it will not come without war, and it will not come at all – because we are here, from the Jordan to the sea, and we are not going anywhere
This sentence is sold around the world, especially on the progressive left, as if it describes some fantasy of inter-ethnic brotherhood: from the Jordan to the sea, everyone will live in peace, share hummus, and teach each other folk dances.
It’s a beautiful idea — kind of like thinking that if you opened all the cages on a safari, the lions, zebras, and giraffes would cook together over a fire.
The Palestinian people may not be a people — but they are certainly a weapon of consciousness. One aimed at the heart of Zionism, armed with lies, heartwarming words, and the cooperation of the post-Western world.
If we don’t understand that the threat is not just missiles but also narratives — we will find ourselves apologizing for our existence. Again.
The culture of negating the other is a symptom of a deeper crisis: a loss of faith in dialogue and in our ability to deal with different opinions. It reflects a left that has lost its way, that has forgotten the values of freedom and openness that it once championed.
From a right-wing perspective, the solution is not a counter-boycott or silencing of the left, but a return to open discourse, in which opinions are examined on the basis of arguments, not mass outrage.
What Are They Trying to Sell Us in the Name of “The Protest”
November 30, 2025
When “Zionism” Has Become a Curse Word in Philosophy Halls?
November 27, 2025
