How Did the BBC Become One of the Most Antisemitic Media Institutions in the World?
In Britain, as in Britain – there is nothing more dangerous than polite hatred.
Because when hatred comes with tea and a biscuit it is much harder to spot.
In Britain, as in Britain – there is nothing more dangerous than polite hatred.
Because when hatred comes with tea and a biscuit it is much harder to spot.
What would the Middle East look like if the ayatollah regime in Iran fell – and what would happen if Israel and Iran became partners?
Would this ideology have survived one week in the Middle East – without the accompaniment of an editorial?
Purim, the holiday when everything turns upside down, is perhaps the most appropriate moment to remind empires drunk on themselves: You too – in the end – are just a costume
The era where hatred doesn’t need a neat ideology, a theory book, or a drawn mustache.
A good algorithm, a little rage, and a lot of screen time are enough.
There is nothing more dangerous than a violent ideology that everyone insists on presenting as a misrepresentation.
Academia doesn’t have to be right-wing, it doesn’t have to be Zionist either.. but it does have to be brave.
Because the moment it stops asking questions, it stops being relevant.
Israel is not the problem – it is the proof.
Proof that Jews have not surrendered – that they have no longer accepted the status of dhimmi, that they dare to be sovereign, armed, and victorious.
If New York really does elect Zohran Mammadani, it will be definitive proof that the city that has been through 9/11, Trump, and Blattner in Times Square – has failed to survive progressivism.
But hey, at least they will have a city free of guilt: no struggle, no crime, no homeless people, no progressive snobbery, no anti-Semitism, no Muslim immigrantsโฆ but guilt