The Israeli Left’s Hottest Hobby: Lawfare
When You Can’t Win at the Ballot Box, Try Beating Your Opponents in Court
Some people take up running.
Others get addicted to CrossFit.
And then there’s a distinctly Israeli pastime that has captured large parts of the local left: lawfare.
Not ordinary petitions.
Not routine legal oversight.
But a full-blown art form – political warfare conducted through judges, legal advisers, inquiry committees, temporary injunctions, and “procedures that haven’t matured yet but must be stopped immediately.”
Because why bother convincing the public when you can bypass it?
What Is Lawfare – and Why It Sounds Nicer Than “We Lost, So Now What?”
Lawfare is a respectable-sounding American term.
It feels academic. Global. Almost enlightened.
Translated into plain Israeli reality, it means:
“We failed to persuade the voters, so we’ll try to paralyze those who did.”
It’s not a coup.
It’s not violence.
It’s not even politics.
It’s bureaucracy with unresolved rage issues.
A struggle where power doesn’t come from ballots, but from interpretation.
Democracy Is Fine – The Voters Are the Problem
The Israeli left, to be clear, is not against democracy.
It just struggles with democracy when democracy insists on voting incorrectly.
As long as the public votes “the right way,” everything is wonderful.
But when the ballot box produces the wrong outcome, suddenly:
- voters were “incited”
- the campaign was “toxic”
- the result is “morally illegitimate”
- and the country is “in existential danger”
That’s when the hobby kicks in.
Courts as a Substitute for Opposition Politics
Opposition is supposed to be hard work:
offer alternatives,
persuade the public,
go to the field,
pay a political price.
But why bother – when you can file a petition?
Israel has developed a unique system:
the court is no longer an umpire – it’s an arena.
Not a gatekeeper – but a player.
Not a referee – but an active participant.
And the left?
It no longer plans campaigns.
It plans cases.
The Petition as a Way of Life
In Israel, almost every meaningful right-wing government decision follows the same script:
- A decision is made.
- Within 20 minutes – headline: “Urgent petition filed.”
- The legal adviser “requests clarifications.”
- A judge “temporarily freezes” the move.
- The media celebrates: “Legal storm.”
- The public gets confused.
- The government stalls.
- Then comes the verdict: “This government can’t function.”
Magic.
Law? No Thanks. Interpretation Will Do
The beauty of lawfare is its flexibility.
You don’t need a clear law.
You don’t need an explicit prohibition.
All you need is a vague concept:
“reasonableness,”
“proportionality,”
“democratic values,”
“a sense of justice.”
And when there are no clear boundaries – there’s always room to stop something.
Because what is law, if not a draft waiting for the correct interpretation?
The Military, Settlements, Government – All Fair Game
No arena is immune from lawfare:
- appointments get disqualified
- military operations are reviewed retroactively
- immigration policy is blocked
- settlement activity is frozen
- reforms are declared “inappropriate at this time”
The common denominator: nothing should happen unless approved by people who were never elected.
The New Morality: The Loser Is More Virtuous
In this upside-down but elegantly packaged worldview, the left has found a moral advantage:
if you lose – you must be enlightened.
The majority? Suspicious.
The government? Problematic.
The ballot box? A dangerous tool requiring supervision.
Thus emerges the absurdity:
those who speak “in the name of democracy” actively undermine it,
while those who were elected are expected to apologize.
So Why Is the Public Angry?
Maybe because there’s a limit.
Because eventually, citizens understand:
this isn’t criticism – it’s obstruction.
not rule of law – but rule by reinterpretation.
not protecting democracy – but fearing it.
And when people feel their vote is counted but not respected,
trust collapses.
Not just in the government.
In the system itself.
Final Chapter: Not a Harmless Hobby – A Strategy
Lawfare isn’t a side effect.
It’s a method.
A method used by an elite that refuses to accept a world in which it is no longer the majority.
A method that prefers judges to voters.
A method that dresses itself up as morality while running on frustration.
Democracy, in the end, doesn’t happen in courtrooms.
It happens at the ballot box.
And anyone trying to win without going through it
isn’t defending democracy.
They’re just trying to bypass it.
And with all due respect to hobbies –
some are better kept for spare time,
not used to run a country.
הירשמו כדי לקבל את הפוסטים האחרונים אל המייל שלכם
